Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0567

reference
26-tree-1
name
0567
tree-preservation-order

undefined

26-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.962903 50.814076)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.962874 50.814073,-0.962879 50.814084,-0.962893 50.814091,-0.962902 50.814092,-0.962911 50.814091,-0.962919 50.814088,-0.962930 50.814079,-0.962931 50.814074,-0.962930 50.814068,-0.962926 50.814063,-0.962920 50.814059,-0.962903 50.814056,-0.962894 50.814056,-0.962886 50.814059,-0.962880 50.814063,-0.962874 50.814073)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL